Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

On-line Annotation System and New Corpora for Fine Grained Sentiment Analysis of Text

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84285

Volkova,  EP
Research Group Space and Body Perception, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84088

Mohler,  BJ
Research Group Space and Body Perception, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Volkova, E., & Mohler, B. (2014). On-line Annotation System and New Corpora for Fine Grained Sentiment Analysis of Text. In 5th International Workshop on Emotion, Social Signals, Sentiment & Linked Open Data (ES³LOD 2014), Satellite of LREC 2014 ELRA (pp. 74-81).


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-1D38-1
Zusammenfassung
We present a new on-line annotation system that allows participants to perform manual sentiment analysis of coherent texts for emotions, as well as indicate the intensity of the emotion and the emphasis in each phrase. We have developed the following set of emotion categories: amusement, anger, contempt, despair, disgust, excitement, fear, hope, joy, neutral, pride, relief, sadness, shame, surprise. This set greatly expands the boundaries of the often used basic emotion categories and is balanced for positive and negative emotions. Using this new annotation tool and its predecessor version, we have collected two corpora of fairy tale texts manually annotated for emotions on the utterance level. One corpus encompasses 72 texts in German, each annotated by two participants. The other corpus is a work in progress and contains three fairytale texts, each annotated by seven participants. The inter-annotator agreement in both corpora is “fair”. Although annotation conflict resolution strategies can be developed for merging several annotations into one, we suggest that for manual SA, the researchers should aim at recruiting more annotators and use the consensus method for retrieving an annotation based on the opinion of the majority.