Do what (you think) the rich will do: inequality, belief formation and group 
identity in public good games

Martinangeli, Andrea F. M.

doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102364

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_2585816_8

DetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Do what (you think) the rich will do: inequality, belief formation and group identity in public good games

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons220670

Martinangeli, Andrea F. M.
Public Economics, MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3070528
(Preprint)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Martinangeli, A. F. M. (2021). Do what (you think) the rich will do: inequality, belief formation and group identity in public good games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 83: 102364. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102364.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-437E-7

Abstract

Beliefs about others’ cooperativeness are among the strongest determinants of cooperative behaviours. Beliefs about different others, however, are not necessarily uniform, nor necessarily related to past behaviours: Different expectations about different others might solely originate from differences in observed individual characteristics. Finally, not all such beliefs need drive conditional behaviour alike.

In a public good game with heterogeneous endowments, I find that rich subjects are expected to cooperate more by both rich and poor individuals, and that behaviours of both the rich and poor correlate only with beliefs about the rich. An intervention aimed at increasing perceived group cohesion has no impact on beliefs and mixed impacts on cooperation. I conclude with implications for information dissemination about uncooperative behaviour in the mass media and avenues for further research.