Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Poster

Evaluating T2* bias impact and correction strategies in quantitative proton density mapping

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons192472

Leutritz,  Tobias
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons147461

Weiskopf,  Nikolaus
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19943

Reimer,  Enrico
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

poster_2694_T2s_bias_on_PD_maps_91x91.pdf
(Ergänzendes Material), 1015KB

Zitation

Balteau, E., Leutritz, T., Weiskopf, N., Reimer, E., Lutti, A., Callaghan, M. F., et al. (2018). Evaluating T2* bias impact and correction strategies in quantitative proton density mapping. Poster presented at Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB, Paris, France.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-1303-5
Zusammenfassung
PURPOSE: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) helps reveal the biophysical properties governing
MRI contrast. By eliminating instrumental biases and other contrast mechanisms influencing the signal
amplitude, quantitative parameter maps can be derived and ultimately serve as in vivo biomarkers 1 . Biases in
proton density (PD) map estimation include radio-frequency transmit (B 1 + ) and receive (B 1 - ) fields and T 2 *
weighting 2-5 . We focus on the T 2 * bias in multi-echo fast low angle shot (FLASH) protocols, where the T 2 * signal
dependence is often neglected 5,6 . Although often pointed out as a potential limitation especially in high iron content areas 5,7,8 , the extent and severity of this bias and the evaluation of correction strategies have not yet been fully reported.
RESULTS: Simulated FLASH multiparameter mapping datasets with increasing noise levels were analysed with the hMRI toolbox and various processing strategies for PD estimation. Without T 2 * bias correction and with calibration to PD=69% in the WM, PD values were overestimated in the cortex (since T 2 * GM >T 2 * WM ) and
strongly underestimated in high iron content areas (globus pallidus, red nuclei, substantia nigra).
CONCLUSIONS: T 2 * bias correction is necessary to increase the sensitivity and specificity of qMRI in these areas. All methods taking T 2 * weighting bias into account are effective. However, method (2) shows lower SNR (relies on a single echo), while methods (1) (with T 2 * correction) and (3) perform similarly.