Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Professionals and Populists: The Making of a Free Market for Medicine in the United States, 1787–1860

Habinek, J., & Haveman, H. A. (2019). Professionals and Populists: The Making of a Free Market for Medicine in the United States, 1787–1860. Socio-Economic Review, 17(1), 81-108. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy052.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
SER_17_2019_Habinek.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 771KB
Name:
SER_17_2019_Habinek.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy052 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Habinek, Jacob1, 2, Autor           
Haveman, Heather A.3, Autor
Affiliations:
1Soziologie des Marktes, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214556              
2Institute for Analytical Sociology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden, ou_persistent22              
3Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: professions, social movements, political parties, historical sociology
 Zusammenfassung: In the early decades of the 19th century, physicians in the USA enjoyed unquestioned
authority in medicine and increasing state recognition. But by mid-century,
their monopoly had given way to a raucous free market for medical care. To explain
the causes and consequences of this dismantling of a professional monopoly, we
draw on political sociology. We argue that to maintain a monopoly, a dominant profession
must defend its cultural authority against rival claims and preserve its institutional
support from the state. A dominant profession can lose its monopoly if rival
occupations mobilize to challenge its cultural authority and if populist political coalitions
mobilize to repeal laws upholding professional monopolies. Our analysis,
which covers all states in the Union by 1860, reveals that the dynamics of contention,
both within the system of professions and in the wider political arena, can
erode the foundations of professional monopolies.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2018-04-202017-08-312018-12-232019-02-042019
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The politics of professions
3. The Evolution of US Medicine, 1787-1860
4. Research design
5. Results
6. Discussion and conclusion
Funding
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy052
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Socio-Economic Review
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 17 (1) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 81 - 108 Identifikator: ISSN: 1475-1461
ISSN: 1475-147X

Quelle 2

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Markets and Social Movements
Genre der Quelle: Heft
 Urheber:
Fligstein, Neil1, Herausgeber
McAdam, Doug2, Herausgeber
Affiliations:
1 Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, ou_persistent22            
2 Department of Sociology, Standford University, Stanford, CA, USA, ou_persistent22            
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -