English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Extortion strategies resist disciplining when higher competitiveness is rewarded with extra gain

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons56825

Milinski,  Manfred
Emeritus Group Milinski, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s41467-019-08671-7.pdf
(Publisher version), 810KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Becks, L., & Milinski, M. (2019). Extortion strategies resist disciplining when higher competitiveness is rewarded with extra gain. Nature Communications, 10(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08671-7.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-0578-1
Abstract
Cooperative strategies are predicted for repeated social interactions. The recently described Zero Determinant (ZD) strategies enforce the partner’s cooperation because the ‘generous’ ZD players help their cooperative partners while ‘extortionate’ ZD players exploit their partners’ cooperation. Partners may accede to extortion because it pays them to do so, but the partner can sabotage his own and his extortioner’s score by defecting to discipline the extortioner. Thus, extortion is predicted to turn into generous and disappear. Here, we show with human volunteers that an additional monetary incentive (bonus) paid to the finally competitively superior player maintains extortion. Unexpectedly, extortioners refused to become disciplined, thus forcing partners to accede. Occasional opposition reduced the extortioners’ gain so that using extortion paid off only because of the bonus. With no bonus incentive, players used the generous ZD strategy. Our findings suggest that extortion strategies can prevail when higher competitiveness is rewarded with extra gain.