date: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.5
pdf:docinfo:title: Electrical Brain Responses Reveal Sequential Constraints on Planning during Music Performance
xmp:CreatorTool: LaTeX with hyperref package
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: Elements in speech and music unfold sequentially over time. To produce sentences and melodies quickly and accurately, individuals must plan upcoming sequence events, as well as monitor outcomes via auditory feedback. We investigated the neural correlates of sequential planning and monitoring processes by manipulating auditory feedback during music performance. Pianists performed isochronous melodies from memory at an initially cued rate while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Pitch feedback was occasionally altered to match either an immediately upcoming Near-Future pitch (next sequence event) or a more distant Far-Future pitch (two events ahead of the current event). Near-Future, but not Far-Future altered feedback perturbed the timing of pianists? performances, suggesting greater interference of Near-Future sequential events with current planning processes. Near-Future feedback triggered a greater reduction in auditory sensory suppression (enhanced response) than Far-Future feedback, reflected in the P2 component elicited by the pitch event following the unexpected pitch change. Greater timing perturbations were associated with enhanced cortical sensory processing of the pitch event following the Near-Future altered feedback. Both types of feedback alterations elicited feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a potentials and amplified spectral power in the theta frequency range. These findings suggest similar constraints on producers? sequential planning to those reported in speech production.
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.5
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: LaTeX with hyperref package
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Electrical Brain Responses Reveal Sequential Constraints on Planning during Music Performance
modified: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
cp:subject: Elements in speech and music unfold sequentially over time. To produce sentences and melodies quickly and accurately, individuals must plan upcoming sequence events, as well as monitor outcomes via auditory feedback. We investigated the neural correlates of sequential planning and monitoring processes by manipulating auditory feedback during music performance. Pianists performed isochronous melodies from memory at an initially cued rate while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Pitch feedback was occasionally altered to match either an immediately upcoming Near-Future pitch (next sequence event) or a more distant Far-Future pitch (two events ahead of the current event). Near-Future, but not Far-Future altered feedback perturbed the timing of pianists? performances, suggesting greater interference of Near-Future sequential events with current planning processes. Near-Future feedback triggered a greater reduction in auditory sensory suppression (enhanced response) than Far-Future feedback, reflected in the P2 component elicited by the pitch event following the unexpected pitch change. Greater timing perturbations were associated with enhanced cortical sensory processing of the pitch event following the Near-Future altered feedback. Both types of feedback alterations elicited feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a potentials and amplified spectral power in the theta frequency range. These findings suggest similar constraints on producers? sequential planning to those reported in speech production.
pdf:docinfo:subject: Elements in speech and music unfold sequentially over time. To produce sentences and melodies quickly and accurately, individuals must plan upcoming sequence events, as well as monitor outcomes via auditory feedback. We investigated the neural correlates of sequential planning and monitoring processes by manipulating auditory feedback during music performance. Pianists performed isochronous melodies from memory at an initially cued rate while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Pitch feedback was occasionally altered to match either an immediately upcoming Near-Future pitch (next sequence event) or a more distant Far-Future pitch (two events ahead of the current event). Near-Future, but not Far-Future altered feedback perturbed the timing of pianists? performances, suggesting greater interference of Near-Future sequential events with current planning processes. Near-Future feedback triggered a greater reduction in auditory sensory suppression (enhanced response) than Far-Future feedback, reflected in the P2 component elicited by the pitch event following the unexpected pitch change. Greater timing perturbations were associated with enhanced cortical sensory processing of the pitch event following the Near-Future altered feedback. Both types of feedback alterations elicited feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a potentials and amplified spectral power in the theta frequency range. These findings suggest similar constraints on producers? sequential planning to those reported in speech production.
pdf:docinfo:creator: Brian Mathias, William J. Gehring and Caroline Palmer
PTEX.Fullbanner: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 (TeX Live 2017/W32TeX) kpathsea version 6.2.3
meta:author: Brian Mathias, William J. Gehring and Caroline Palmer
trapped: False
meta:creation-date: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
created: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
Creation-Date: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
Author: Brian Mathias, William J. Gehring and Caroline Palmer
producer: pdfTeX-1.40.18
pdf:docinfo:producer: pdfTeX-1.40.18
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 17
Keywords: sensorimotor learning; sequence production; sequence planning; feedback monitoring; EEG; N1; FRN; music performance; music cognition; altered auditory feedback
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
dc:creator: Brian Mathias, William J. Gehring and Caroline Palmer
dcterms:created: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
Last-Modified: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
dcterms:modified: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
title: Electrical Brain Responses Reveal Sequential Constraints on Planning during Music Performance
Last-Save-Date: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
pdf:docinfo:keywords: sensorimotor learning; sequence production; sequence planning; feedback monitoring; EEG; N1; FRN; music performance; music cognition; altered auditory feedback
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
meta:save-date: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z
pdf:docinfo:custom:PTEX.Fullbanner: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 (TeX Live 2017/W32TeX) kpathsea version 6.2.3
Content-Type: application/pdf
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Brian Mathias, William J. Gehring and Caroline Palmer
dc:subject: sensorimotor learning; sequence production; sequence planning; feedback monitoring; EEG; N1; FRN; music performance; music cognition; altered auditory feedback
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 21
pdf:charsPerPage: 3245
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
pdf:docinfo:trapped: False
meta:keyword: sensorimotor learning; sequence production; sequence planning; feedback monitoring; EEG; N1; FRN; music performance; music cognition; altered auditory feedback
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:created: 2019-01-28T10:05:45Z