date: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.5
pdf:docinfo:title: Are We Capturing Faunal Intactness? A Comparison of Intact Forest Landscapes and the ``Last of the Wild in Each Ecoregion''
xmp:CreatorTool: LaTeX with hyperref package + hypdvips
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: Efforts to designate priority areas for conservation have had a long history, with most modern initiatives focused on either designating areas important for biodiversity or those least impacted by direct human disturbance.
language: en
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.5
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: LaTeX with hyperref package + hypdvips
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Are We Capturing Faunal Intactness? A Comparison of Intact Forest Landscapes and the ``Last of the Wild in Each Ecoregion''
modified: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
cp:subject: Efforts to designate priority areas for conservation have had a long history, with most modern initiatives focused on either designating areas important for biodiversity or those least impacted by direct human disturbance.
pdf:docinfo:subject: Efforts to designate priority areas for conservation have had a long history, with most modern initiatives focused on either designating areas important for biodiversity or those least impacted by direct human disturbance.
pdf:docinfo:creator: Andrew J. Plumptre
meta:author: Andrew J. Plumptre
meta:creation-date: 2019-05-29T11:53:50Z
created: 2019-05-29T11:53:50Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
Creation-Date: 2019-05-29T11:53:50Z
Author: Andrew J. Plumptre
producer: dvips + MiKTeX GPL Ghostscript  9.0
pdf:docinfo:producer: dvips + MiKTeX GPL Ghostscript  9.0
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0
dc:description: Efforts to designate priority areas for conservation have had a long history, with most modern initiatives focused on either designating areas important for biodiversity or those least impacted by direct human disturbance.
Keywords: intact forest landscapes, ecoregions, faunal intactness, prioritization for conservation, species extinction
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
dc:creator: Andrew J. Plumptre
description: Efforts to designate priority areas for conservation have had a long history, with most modern initiatives focused on either designating areas important for biodiversity or those least impacted by direct human disturbance.
dcterms:created: 2019-05-29T11:53:50Z
Last-Modified: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
dcterms:modified: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
title: Are We Capturing Faunal Intactness? A Comparison of Intact Forest Landscapes and the ``Last of the Wild in Each Ecoregion''
xmpMM:DocumentID: ec4a5d0c-8463-11e9-0000-beeae5fced27
Last-Save-Date: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
pdf:docinfo:keywords: intact forest landscapes, ecoregions, faunal intactness, prioritization for conservation, species extinction
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
meta:save-date: 2019-07-10T10:29:49Z
Content-Type: application/pdf
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Andrew J. Plumptre
dc:language: en
dc:subject: intact forest landscapes, ecoregions, faunal intactness, prioritization for conservation, species extinction
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 10
pdf:charsPerPage: 3472
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
meta:keyword: intact forest landscapes, ecoregions, faunal intactness, prioritization for conservation, species extinction
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:created: 2019-05-29T11:53:50Z