Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Not Just Money: Unequal Responsiveness in Egalitarian Democracies

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons135655

Elsässer,  Lea
Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Institute for Political Science, University of Münster, Germany;
Institute for Socio-Economics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Elsässer, L., Hense, S., & Schäfer, A. (2021). Not Just Money: Unequal Responsiveness in Egalitarian Democracies. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(12), 1890-1908. doi:10.1080/13501763.2020.1801804.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-EDA2-8
Zusammenfassung
A growing body of research has documented political inequality along class lines at different stages of the representation process. This article contributes to our understanding of unequal responsiveness and its causes with an in-depth study of Germany that investigates the link between preferences and policymakers’ decisions. Using an original dataset covering 746 survey questions on specific reform proposals from 1980 to 2013, we provide the first study of a European democracy that investigates whether responsiveness patterns vary between economic and cultural policies or different governing coalitions. We show that decisions are skewed towards upper occupational and educational groups, irrespective of policy type or government composition. These results advance the discussion of potential mechanisms for unequal responsiveness. As privileged groups are overrepresented in parliament, our findings support the argument that the social bias in the make-up of parliaments matters for substantive representation.