date: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z pdf:PDFVersion: 1.6 pdf:docinfo:title: Do different response formats affect how test takers approach a clinical reasoning task? An experimental study on antecedents of diagnostic accuracy using a constructed response and a selected response format xmp:CreatorTool: Springer access_permission:can_print_degraded: true subject: Advances in Health Sciences Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z pdfa:PDFVersion: A-2b xmpMM:History:Action: converted language: EN dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.6 pdf:docinfo:custom:robots: noindex pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: Springer access_permission:fill_in_form: true xmpMM:History:When: 2021-09-13T16:09:37Z pdf:encrypted: false dc:title: Do different response formats affect how test takers approach a clinical reasoning task? An experimental study on antecedents of diagnostic accuracy using a constructed response and a selected response format modified: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z cp:subject: Advances in Health Sciences Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z xmpMM:History:SoftwareAgent: pdfToolbox pdf:docinfo:custom:CrossMarkDomains[1]: springer.com robots: noindex pdf:docinfo:subject: Advances in Health Sciences Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z xmpMM:History:InstanceID: uuid:8a94c341-ccd0-411d-b0c8-a108cf5cf146 pdf:docinfo:creator: Stefan K. Schauber meta:author: Stefanie C. Hautz meta:creation-date: 2021-05-11T13:32:41Z pdf:docinfo:custom:CrossmarkMajorVersionDate: 2010-04-23 created: 2021-05-11T13:32:41Z access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true Creation-Date: 2021-05-11T13:32:41Z pdfaid:part: 2 pdf:docinfo:custom:CrossMarkDomains[2]: springerlink.com pdf:docinfo:custom:doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z pdf:docinfo:custom:CrossmarkDomainExclusive: true Author: Stefanie C. Hautz producer: Acrobat Distiller 10.1.8 (Windows) CrossmarkDomainExclusive: true pdf:docinfo:producer: Acrobat Distiller 10.1.8 (Windows) doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0 dc:description: Advances in Health Sciences Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z Keywords: Clinical reasoning,Response format,Cognitive reflection,Processing fluency access_permission:modify_annotations: true dc:creator: Stefanie C. Hautz description: Advances in Health Sciences Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z dcterms:created: 2021-05-11T13:32:41Z Last-Modified: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z dcterms:modified: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z title: Do different response formats affect how test takers approach a clinical reasoning task? An experimental study on antecedents of diagnostic accuracy using a constructed response and a selected response format xmpMM:DocumentID: uuid:d4006c51-f534-4227-9d5d-80303d811606 Last-Save-Date: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z CrossMarkDomains[1]: springer.com pdf:docinfo:keywords: Clinical reasoning,Response format,Cognitive reflection,Processing fluency pdf:docinfo:modified: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z meta:save-date: 2021-09-13T10:40:14Z Content-Type: application/pdf X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser creator: Stefanie C. Hautz pdfaid:conformance: B dc:language: EN dc:subject: Clinical reasoning,Response format,Cognitive reflection,Processing fluency access_permission:assemble_document: true xmpTPg:NPages: 16 pdf:charsPerPage: 2468 access_permission:extract_content: true access_permission:can_print: true CrossMarkDomains[2]: springerlink.com meta:keyword: Clinical reasoning,Response format,Cognitive reflection,Processing fluency access_permission:can_modify: true pdf:docinfo:created: 2021-05-11T13:32:41Z CrossmarkMajorVersionDate: 2010-04-23