Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Beitrag in Sammelwerk

Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Abstract and Concrete Forms of Decriminalisation. The Example of Italy

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons212204

Jarvers,  Konstanze
Criminal Law, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Jarvers, K. (2021). Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Abstract and Concrete Forms of Decriminalisation. The Example of Italy. In E. Billis, N. Knust, & J. P. Rui (Eds.), Proportionality in crime control and criminal justice (pp. 207-226). Oxford: Hart Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781509938636.ch-011.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-B4B3-2
Zusammenfassung
The question of the proportionality and effectiveness of criminal law was addressed back in the nineteenth century by Franz von Liszt, who called punishment a double-edged sword aimed at the protection of legal interests (of potential victims) through the infringement of legal interests (of potential offenders). If punishment is to serve as a means to an end, it must, on the one hand, be tailored to that end (proportionality) and, on the other hand, economy in its use must be maximised (effectiveness). In light of these considerations, this chapter examines whether and to what extent modern trends that limit the scope of criminal law by introducing both abstract and concrete forms of decriminalisation can lead to a more proportionate and, at the same time, a more effective criminal justice system. Following an overview of the general concepts, the chapter focuses on Italy as a pertinent and complex example.