Item

Abstract

We evaluate numerically three different models for the parent comet of the Kreutz family of sungrazers: (i) A Centaur on a highly inclined or retrograde orbit that diffuse to the inner planetary region where it became a sungrazer (Model 1). (ii) A parent comet injected from the Oort cloud straight into a near-parabolic, sungrazing orbit. Near perihelion the comet was disrupted by tidal forces from the Sun giving rise to a myriad of fragments that created the Kreutz family (Model 2). (iii) A two-step process by which an Oort cloud comet is first injected in a non-sungrazing, Earth-crossing orbit where its semimajor axis decreases from typical Oort cloud values (a ∼ 104 au) to around 102 au, and then it evolves to a sungrazing orbit by the Lidov–Kozai mechanism (Model 3). Model 1 fails to produce sungrazers of the Kreutz type. Model 2 produces some Kreutz sungrazers and has the appeal of being the most straightforward. Yet the impulses received by the fragments originated in the catastrophic disruption of the parent comet will tend to acquire a wide range of orbital energies or periods (from short-period to long-period orbits) that is in contradiction with the observations. Model 3 seems to be the most promising one since it leads to the generation of some sungrazers of the Kreutz type and, particularly, it reproduces the clustering of the argument of perihelion ω of the observed Kreutz family members around 60°–90°, as a natural consequence of the action of the Lidov–Kozai mechanism.