Item

Abstract

The use of lanthanide complexes as powerful auxiliaries for biocrystallography prompted us to systematically analyze the influence of the commercial crystallization kit composition on the efficiency of two lanthanide additives: [Eu(DPA)3]3– and Tb-Xo4. This study reveals that the tris(dipicolinate) complex presents a lower chemical stability and a strong tendency toward false positives, which are detrimental for its use in a high-throughput robotized crystallization platform. In particular, the crystal structures of (Mg(H2O)6)3[Eu(DPA)3]2·7H2O (1), {(Ca(H2O)4)3[Eu(DPA)3]2}n·10nH2O (2), and {Cu(DPA)(H2O)2}n (3), resulting from spontaneous crystallization in the presence of a divalent alkaline-earth cation and transmetalation, are reported. On the other hand, Tb-Xo4 is perfectly soluble in the crystallization media, stable in the presence of alkaline-earth dications, and slowly decomposes (within days) by transmetalation with transition metals. The original structure of [Tb4L4(H2O)4]Cl4·15H2O (4) is also described, where L represents a bis(pinacolato)triazacyclononane ligand. This paper also highlights a potential synergy of interactions between Tb-Xo4 and components of the crystallization mixtures, leading to the formation of complex adducts like {AdkA/Tb-Xo4/Mg2+/glycerol} in the protein binding sites. The observation of such multicomponent adducts illustrated the complexity and versatility of the supramolecular chemistry occurring at the surface of the proteins.