日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Revisiting the Un/Ethical: The Complex Ethics of Elite Studies Research

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons268153

Lillie,  Karen
Soziologie des Marktes, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Institute of Education, University College London, UK;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

QR_21_2021_Lillie.pdf
(全文テキスト(全般)), 5MB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Lillie, K., & Ayling, P. (2021). Revisiting the Un/Ethical: The Complex Ethics of Elite Studies Research. Qualitative Research, 21(6), 890-905. doi:10.1177/1468794120965361.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-A823-2
要旨
Current ethical codes inadequately speak to the complexities of researching elite groups. These groups contribute to broader inequalities and yet are protected from scrutiny by their own resources and, in the research context, ethical guidelines. For this reason, Gaztambide-Fernández (2015) called for those researching elite groups to adopt an ‘un/ethical’ position. This position circumvents conventional ethical codes to disrupt the power of research participants. In this paper, we put forward a considered assessment of this position. We reflect on and theorise our own experiences in the field from this ethical perspective, paying particular attention to our multifaceted insider/outsider statuses. We find that an un/ethical position offers short-term benefits but also does long-term damage to the elite studies scholar community. Thus, we counter-propose a way forward that dismantles power relations while avoiding the drawbacks of the un/ethical approach. Our proposal continues a necessary discussion around the ethics of elite studies research.