Leaving the Path of Optimality Calculation: A Commentary on Fenton-O'Creevy and 
Tuckett, 2021: Selecting Futures: The Role of Conviction, Narratives, 
Ambivalence, and Constructive Doubt

Beckert, Jens

doi:10.1002/ffo2.125

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Leaving the Path of Optimality Calculation: A Commentary on Fenton-O'Creevy and Tuckett, 2021: Selecting Futures: The Role of Conviction, Narratives, Ambivalence, and Constructive Doubt

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons41135

Beckert, Jens
Wirtschaftssoziologie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.125
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

FFS_4_2022_Beckert.pdf
(Any fulltext), 240KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Beckert, J. (2022). Leaving the Path of Optimality Calculation: A Commentary on Fenton-O'Creevy and Tuckett, 2021: Selecting Futures: The Role of Conviction, Narratives, Ambivalence, and Constructive Doubt. Futures & Foresight Science, 4(3-4): e125. doi:10.1002/ffo2.125.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-1664-D

Abstract

There is no abstract available