date: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.7
pdf:docinfo:title: Digital Sequence Information between Benefit-Sharing and Open Data
xmp:CreatorTool: LaTeX with hyperref package
Keywords: 
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: AcademicSubjects/SCI01050, Original Article, DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsac035, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 00, 00, 22 1 2022. Abstract: Currently, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are negotiating a strategic plan to save biodiversity. One crucial element of an agreement is the question of whether and how digital sequence information (DSI) is subject to access and benefit-sharing from the utilization of genetic resources, one main instrument of the CBD. In the EU, the Open Data Directive (ODD) of 2019 and the recently adopted Data Governance Act (DGA) already cover research data and to some extent DSI. An analysis of the ODD and the DGA throws a spotlight on the legal uncertainty of utilizing DSI and reveals systemic tensions between open data principles and benefit-sharing restrictions on non-commercial use. It also suggests that a future benefit-sharing mechanism for DSI should avoid distinguishing between commercial and non-commercial use upstream, but should instead favor a solution, which imposes benefit-sharing obligations further downstream or outside of the DSI life cycle. 
PDFVersion: 1.5
language: en
dcterms:created: 2022-11-20T14:00:09Z
Last-Modified: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
dcterms:modified: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.7
title: Digital Sequence Information between Benefit-Sharing and Open Data
Last-Save-Date: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: LaTeX with hyperref package
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:docinfo:keywords: 
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
meta:save-date: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Digital Sequence Information between Benefit-Sharing and Open Data
modified: 2022-11-29T16:35:49Z
cp:subject: AcademicSubjects/SCI01050, Original Article, DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsac035, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 00, 00, 22 1 2022. Abstract: Currently, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are negotiating a strategic plan to save biodiversity. One crucial element of an agreement is the question of whether and how digital sequence information (DSI) is subject to access and benefit-sharing from the utilization of genetic resources, one main instrument of the CBD. In the EU, the Open Data Directive (ODD) of 2019 and the recently adopted Data Governance Act (DGA) already cover research data and to some extent DSI. An analysis of the ODD and the DGA throws a spotlight on the legal uncertainty of utilizing DSI and reveals systemic tensions between open data principles and benefit-sharing restrictions on non-commercial use. It also suggests that a future benefit-sharing mechanism for DSI should avoid distinguishing between commercial and non-commercial use upstream, but should instead favor a solution, which imposes benefit-sharing obligations further downstream or outside of the DSI life cycle. 
pdf:docinfo:custom:PDFVersion: 1.5
pdf:docinfo:subject: AcademicSubjects/SCI01050, Original Article, DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsac035, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 00, 00, 22 1 2022. Abstract: Currently, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are negotiating a strategic plan to save biodiversity. One crucial element of an agreement is the question of whether and how digital sequence information (DSI) is subject to access and benefit-sharing from the utilization of genetic resources, one main instrument of the CBD. In the EU, the Open Data Directive (ODD) of 2019 and the recently adopted Data Governance Act (DGA) already cover research data and to some extent DSI. An analysis of the ODD and the DGA throws a spotlight on the legal uncertainty of utilizing DSI and reveals systemic tensions between open data principles and benefit-sharing restrictions on non-commercial use. It also suggests that a future benefit-sharing mechanism for DSI should avoid distinguishing between commercial and non-commercial use upstream, but should instead favor a solution, which imposes benefit-sharing obligations further downstream or outside of the DSI life cycle. 
Content-Type: application/pdf
pdf:docinfo:creator: 
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
dc:language: en
dc:subject: 
meta:creation-date: 2022-11-20T14:00:09Z
created: 2022-11-20T14:00:09Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 29
Creation-Date: 2022-11-20T14:00:09Z
pdf:charsPerPage: 2617
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
meta:keyword: 
producer: Acrobat Distiller 22.0 (Windows); modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:producer: Acrobat Distiller 22.0 (Windows); modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:docinfo:created: 2022-11-20T14:00:09Z