日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

Preprint

Relating Objective Complexity, Subjective Complexity and Beauty in Binary Pixel Patterns

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons266330

Nath,  SS       
Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons245141

Brändle,  F       
Research Group Computational Principles of Intelligence, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons139782

Schulz,  E       
Research Group Computational Principles of Intelligence, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons217460

Dayan,  P       
Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons220274

Brielmann,  A       
Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Nath, S., Brändle, F., Schulz, E., Dayan, P., & Brielmann, A. (2024). Relating Objective Complexity, Subjective Complexity and Beauty in Binary Pixel Patterns. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Epub ahead. doi:10.1037/aca0000657.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-B694-F
要旨
The complexity of images critically influences our assessment of their beauty. However, studies relating assessments of complexity and beauty to potential objective measures are hampered by the use of hand-crafted stimuli which are hard to reproduce and manipulate. To tackle this, we developed a systematic method for generating 2D black-and-white pixel patterns using cellular automata and collected ratings of complexity and beauty from 80 participants. We developed various computational measures of pattern quantification such as density, entropies, local spatial complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, and asymmetries. We also introduced an “intricacy” measure quantifying the number of components in a pattern using a graph-based approach. We related these objective measures with participant judgments of complexity and beauty to find that a weighted combination of local spatial complexity and intricacy was an effective predictor (R2test = .47) of complexity. This implies that people’s complexity ratings depended on the local arrangement of pixels along with the global number of components in the pattern. Furthermore, we found a positive linear influence of complexity ratings on beauty, with a negative linear influence of disorder (asymmetry and entropy), and a negative interaction between the two quantities (R2test = .65). This implies that there is beauty in complexity as long as there is sufficient order. Lastly, a moderated mediation analysis showed that subjective complexity mediates the influence of objective complexity (OC) on beauty, implying that subjective complexity provides useful information over and above OC.