date: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.6
pdf:docinfo:title: Institutional logics in the open science practices of university--industry research collaboration
xmp:CreatorTool: LuaLaTeX with hyperref package
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad037, Science and Public Policy, 00, 00, Published xx xxx xxx. Abstract: AbstractAs an emerging agenda in science and public policy discourse, the open science (OS) movement has affected university?industry research collaboration (UIRC) including normative changes concerning actors? value and belief systems. Thus, the following questions have become pertinent: what are the norms and beliefs of key actors engaged in UIRC regarding OS practices? How have the norms and beliefs led to tensions in UIRC and dynamics facilitating or impeding OS? This study explores these questions through two case studies by applying institutional logics theory as an analytical lens. Through analysing case studies concerning UIRC in Finland, a pioneer in the global OS movement, six institutional logics that are either pro- or contra-OS practices were identified: the state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust?based community and sustainability-based community logics. The strongest tensions are between the state and market logics and between the profession and market logics. In the end of the study, recommendations are solicited for OS policymakers and practitioners based on the research findings.
pdfa:PDFVersion: A-3a
xmpMM:History:Action: converted
language: en-US
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.6
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: LuaLaTeX with hyperref package
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
xmpMM:History:When: 2023-06-17T16:48:57Z
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Institutional logics in the open science practices of university--industry research collaboration
modified: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
cp:subject: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad037, Science and Public Policy, 00, 00, Published xx xxx xxx. Abstract: AbstractAs an emerging agenda in science and public policy discourse, the open science (OS) movement has affected university?industry research collaboration (UIRC) including normative changes concerning actors? value and belief systems. Thus, the following questions have become pertinent: what are the norms and beliefs of key actors engaged in UIRC regarding OS practices? How have the norms and beliefs led to tensions in UIRC and dynamics facilitating or impeding OS? This study explores these questions through two case studies by applying institutional logics theory as an analytical lens. Through analysing case studies concerning UIRC in Finland, a pioneer in the global OS movement, six institutional logics that are either pro- or contra-OS practices were identified: the state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust?based community and sustainability-based community logics. The strongest tensions are between the state and market logics and between the profession and market logics. In the end of the study, recommendations are solicited for OS policymakers and practitioners based on the research findings.
xmpMM:History:SoftwareAgent: Preflight
pdf:docinfo:subject: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad037, Science and Public Policy, 00, 00, Published xx xxx xxx. Abstract: AbstractAs an emerging agenda in science and public policy discourse, the open science (OS) movement has affected university?industry research collaboration (UIRC) including normative changes concerning actors? value and belief systems. Thus, the following questions have become pertinent: what are the norms and beliefs of key actors engaged in UIRC regarding OS practices? How have the norms and beliefs led to tensions in UIRC and dynamics facilitating or impeding OS? This study explores these questions through two case studies by applying institutional logics theory as an analytical lens. Through analysing case studies concerning UIRC in Finland, a pioneer in the global OS movement, six institutional logics that are either pro- or contra-OS practices were identified: the state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust?based community and sustainability-based community logics. The strongest tensions are between the state and market logics and between the profession and market logics. In the end of the study, recommendations are solicited for OS policymakers and practitioners based on the research findings.
xmpMM:History:InstanceID: uuid:c6e830cf-d547-4b07-9120-2643b3f82101
pdf:docinfo:creator: Annina Lattu
meta:author: Yuzhuo Cai
trapped: Unknown
meta:creation-date: 2023-06-16T10:44:39Z
created: 2023-06-16T10:44:39Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
Creation-Date: 2023-06-16T10:44:39Z
pdfaid:part: 3
Author: Yuzhuo Cai
producer: LuaLaTeX; modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:docinfo:producer: LuaLaTeX; modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0
dc:description: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad037, Science and Public Policy, 00, 00, Published xx xxx xxx. Abstract: AbstractAs an emerging agenda in science and public policy discourse, the open science (OS) movement has affected university?industry research collaboration (UIRC) including normative changes concerning actors? value and belief systems. Thus, the following questions have become pertinent: what are the norms and beliefs of key actors engaged in UIRC regarding OS practices? How have the norms and beliefs led to tensions in UIRC and dynamics facilitating or impeding OS? This study explores these questions through two case studies by applying institutional logics theory as an analytical lens. Through analysing case studies concerning UIRC in Finland, a pioneer in the global OS movement, six institutional logics that are either pro- or contra-OS practices were identified: the state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust?based community and sustainability-based community logics. The strongest tensions are between the state and market logics and between the profession and market logics. In the end of the study, recommendations are solicited for OS policymakers and practitioners based on the research findings.
Keywords: "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"; "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
PDFVersion: 1.5
dc:creator: Yuzhuo Cai
description: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad037, Science and Public Policy, 00, 00, Published xx xxx xxx. Abstract: AbstractAs an emerging agenda in science and public policy discourse, the open science (OS) movement has affected university?industry research collaboration (UIRC) including normative changes concerning actors? value and belief systems. Thus, the following questions have become pertinent: what are the norms and beliefs of key actors engaged in UIRC regarding OS practices? How have the norms and beliefs led to tensions in UIRC and dynamics facilitating or impeding OS? This study explores these questions through two case studies by applying institutional logics theory as an analytical lens. Through analysing case studies concerning UIRC in Finland, a pioneer in the global OS movement, six institutional logics that are either pro- or contra-OS practices were identified: the state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust?based community and sustainability-based community logics. The strongest tensions are between the state and market logics and between the profession and market logics. In the end of the study, recommendations are solicited for OS policymakers and practitioners based on the research findings.
dcterms:created: 2023-06-16T10:44:39Z
Last-Modified: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
dcterms:modified: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
title: Institutional logics in the open science practices of university--industry research collaboration
xmpMM:DocumentID: uuid:05fdc905-46c4-41dc-a418-8205f2bb182b
Last-Save-Date: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
pdf:docinfo:keywords: "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"; "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
meta:save-date: 2023-08-10T10:15:08Z
pdf:docinfo:custom:PDFVersion: 1.5
Content-Type: application/pdf
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Yuzhuo Cai
pdfaid:conformance: A
dc:language: en-US
dc:subject: "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"; "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 12
pdf:charsPerPage: 5592
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
pdf:docinfo:trapped: Unknown
meta:keyword: "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"; "open science policy; academia?industry linkages; institutional theory; open access; open data"
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:created: 2023-06-16T10:44:39Z