Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo 
Self-Employed

Stamm, Isabell; Schürmann, Lena; Scheidgen, Katharina

doi:10.1177/09500170231206083

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-Employed

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons267909

Stamm, Isabell
Vermögen und soziale Ungleichheit, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231206083
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

WES_2023_Stamm.pdf
(Any fulltext), 335KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Stamm, I., Schürmann, L., & Scheidgen, K. (2023). Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-Employed. Work, Employment and Society. doi:10.1177/09500170231206083.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-F737-F

Abstract

As more people work outside standard employment, the foundations of work solidarity are contested. How does work solidarity arise in atypical forms of work that are characterised by flexible, autonomous and self-dependent organisation, such as in solo self-employment? Drawing on a discursive approach to work solidarity, this article emphasises how market dependence can serve as a boundary construction to create work solidarity. Empirically, this study engages in a discourse analysis on Soforthilfe, a policy measure introduced by the German government to financially assist solo self-employed people during the Covid-19 lockdown. In this discourse, market dependence serves to identify this social group’s need (social boundary) and to set out the corresponding policies for financial assistance (substantive boundary). Four solidarity norms – relief, equality, preservation and quasi-equivalence – support this boundary construction. The article contributes to the current discourse on work solidarity by identifying an additional boundary construction.