Deep neural networks are not a single hypothesis but a language for expressing 
computational hypotheses

Golan, Tal; Taylor, JohnMark; Schütt, Heiko; Peters, Benjamin; Sommers, Rowan P.; Seeliger, Katja; Doerig, Adrien; Linton, Paul; Konkle, Talia; van Gerven, Marcel; Kording, Konrad; Richards, Blake; Kietzmann, Tim C.; Lindsay, Grace W.; Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus

doi:10.1017/S0140525X23001553

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Deep neural networks are not a single hypothesis but a language for expressing computational hypotheses

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons281113

Seeliger, Katja
Max Planck Research Group Vision and Computational Cognition, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Golan_2023.pdf
(Any fulltext), 201KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Golan, T., Taylor, J., Schütt, H., Peters, B., Sommers, R. P., Seeliger, K., et al. (2023). Deep neural networks are not a single hypothesis but a language for expressing computational hypotheses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46: e392. doi:10.1017/S0140525X23001553.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-05F3-A

Abstract

An ideal vision model accounts for behavior and neurophysiology in both naturalistic conditions and designed lab experiments. Unlike psychological theories, artificial neural networks (ANNs) actually perform visual tasks and generate testable predictions for arbitrary inputs. These advantages enable ANNs to engage the entire spectrum of the evidence. Failures of particular models drive progress in a vibrant ANN research program of human vision.