date: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.6
pdf:docinfo:title: Losing ground: business power, standardized assets and the regulation of land acquisition taxes in Germany and Sweden
xmp:CreatorTool: Servigistics Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 11.1.4667/W
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: Doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae003 Socio-Economic Review, 22, 2, 2024 Publication Date: 01/03/2024 Abstract Previous literature on the nexus between land, finance and business power has not systematically analysed the role of the liquidity of businesses? assets. Combining process tracing with a comparative design, this study contributes a perspective on the role of standardized assets for business power. It investigates land acquisition tax reforms asking why institutional landowners? structural and instrumental power was successful in Sweden but not in Germany. In Germany, a reform was passed in 2021 which disadvantages the private market institutional landowners compared to their public counterparts. This study argues that the standardization of landed property as liquid stock enabled publicly listed property companies to unite with other stock market actors, increasing their power resources and allowing them to successfully promote their interests due to the liquidity demands of their assets. This stands in contrast to the poorer reception of the liquidity of private market actors in their land-related transactions.
language: en
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.6
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: Servigistics Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 11.1.4667/W
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Losing ground: business power, standardized assets and the regulation of land acquisition taxes in Germany and Sweden
modified: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
cp:subject: Doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae003 Socio-Economic Review, 22, 2, 2024 Publication Date: 01/03/2024 Abstract Previous literature on the nexus between land, finance and business power has not systematically analysed the role of the liquidity of businesses? assets. Combining process tracing with a comparative design, this study contributes a perspective on the role of standardized assets for business power. It investigates land acquisition tax reforms asking why institutional landowners? structural and instrumental power was successful in Sweden but not in Germany. In Germany, a reform was passed in 2021 which disadvantages the private market institutional landowners compared to their public counterparts. This study argues that the standardization of landed property as liquid stock enabled publicly listed property companies to unite with other stock market actors, increasing their power resources and allowing them to successfully promote their interests due to the liquidity demands of their assets. This stands in contrast to the poorer reception of the liquidity of private market actors in their land-related transactions.
pdf:docinfo:subject: Doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae003 Socio-Economic Review, 22, 2, 2024 Publication Date: 01/03/2024 Abstract Previous literature on the nexus between land, finance and business power has not systematically analysed the role of the liquidity of businesses? assets. Combining process tracing with a comparative design, this study contributes a perspective on the role of standardized assets for business power. It investigates land acquisition tax reforms asking why institutional landowners? structural and instrumental power was successful in Sweden but not in Germany. In Germany, a reform was passed in 2021 which disadvantages the private market institutional landowners compared to their public counterparts. This study argues that the standardization of landed property as liquid stock enabled publicly listed property companies to unite with other stock market actors, increasing their power resources and allowing them to successfully promote their interests due to the liquidity demands of their assets. This stands in contrast to the poorer reception of the liquidity of private market actors in their land-related transactions.
pdf:docinfo:creator: Hanna Doose
meta:author: Hanna Doose
meta:creation-date: 2024-06-18T10:49:03Z
created: 2024-06-18T10:49:03Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
Creation-Date: 2024-06-18T10:49:03Z
Author: Hanna Doose
producer: PDFlib+PDI 9.0.7p3 (C++/Win32); modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:docinfo:producer: PDFlib+PDI 9.0.7p3 (C++/Win32); modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:docinfo:custom:EPSprocessor: PStill version 1.84.42
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0
dc:description: Doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae003 Socio-Economic Review, 22, 2, 2024 Publication Date: 01/03/2024 Abstract Previous literature on the nexus between land, finance and business power has not systematically analysed the role of the liquidity of businesses? assets. Combining process tracing with a comparative design, this study contributes a perspective on the role of standardized assets for business power. It investigates land acquisition tax reforms asking why institutional landowners? structural and instrumental power was successful in Sweden but not in Germany. In Germany, a reform was passed in 2021 which disadvantages the private market institutional landowners compared to their public counterparts. This study argues that the standardization of landed property as liquid stock enabled publicly listed property companies to unite with other stock market actors, increasing their power resources and allowing them to successfully promote their interests due to the liquidity demands of their assets. This stands in contrast to the poorer reception of the liquidity of private market actors in their land-related transactions.
Keywords: power; taxation; financialization; interest groups
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
dc:creator: Hanna Doose
description: Doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae003 Socio-Economic Review, 22, 2, 2024 Publication Date: 01/03/2024 Abstract Previous literature on the nexus between land, finance and business power has not systematically analysed the role of the liquidity of businesses? assets. Combining process tracing with a comparative design, this study contributes a perspective on the role of standardized assets for business power. It investigates land acquisition tax reforms asking why institutional landowners? structural and instrumental power was successful in Sweden but not in Germany. In Germany, a reform was passed in 2021 which disadvantages the private market institutional landowners compared to their public counterparts. This study argues that the standardization of landed property as liquid stock enabled publicly listed property companies to unite with other stock market actors, increasing their power resources and allowing them to successfully promote their interests due to the liquidity demands of their assets. This stands in contrast to the poorer reception of the liquidity of private market actors in their land-related transactions.
dcterms:created: 2024-06-18T10:49:03Z
Last-Modified: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
dcterms:modified: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
title: Losing ground: business power, standardized assets and the regulation of land acquisition taxes in Germany and Sweden
xmpMM:DocumentID: uuid:A7F0C1E5-D683-3E86-2D72-64EF2A48D079
Last-Save-Date: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
pdf:docinfo:keywords: power; taxation; financialization; interest groups
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
meta:save-date: 2024-07-01T11:56:03Z
Content-Type: application/pdf
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Hanna Doose
EPSprocessor: PStill version 1.84.42
dc:language: en
dc:subject: power; taxation; financialization; interest groups
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 21
pdf:charsPerPage: 2607
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
meta:keyword: power; taxation; financialization; interest groups
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:created: 2024-06-18T10:49:03Z