English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Fighting fair: Community perspectives on the fairness of performance enhancement in esports

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons275650

Friehs,  Maximilian
Research Group Psychology of Conflict Risk and Safety, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands;
School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Ireland;
Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Friehs_Klarkowski_2024.pdf
(Publisher version), 9MB

Supplementary Material (public)

Friehs_Klarkowski_2024_Suppl.docx
(Supplementary material), 180KB

Citation

Friehs, M., Klarkowski, M., Frommel, J., Phillips, C., & Mandryk, R. L. (2024). Fighting fair: Community perspectives on the fairness of performance enhancement in esports. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6: 1330755. doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1330755.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-1982-2
Abstract
Aims: This study aims to explore community perspectives on enhancer usage in competitive gaming and esports, focusing on the perception of fairness and concerns about various potential performance enhancers.

Methods: We conducted both qualitative and quantitative surveys to understand the competitive gaming community's opinions on different types of performance enhancers and their potential impact on esports. A thematic analysis was performed to identify key themes in how players rationalize their opinions.

Conclusions: The gaming community differentiates between potential performance enhancers based on how problematic they are for the esports scene, with the most concern surrounding hard drugs, pharmaceuticals, and brain stimulation interventions. Participants who are more invested in competitive gaming tend to be more sceptical of enhancers and express greater concerns. Four themes were identified in the thematic analysis: (1) risk, (2) morality, (3) enhancer effects, and (4) regulation. To increase acceptance and perceived legitimacy in decision-making, it is recommended that regulators engage a variety of stakeholders in transparent decision-making processes when forming tournament rules and regulations. This will help address the fragmented regulatory landscape and prevent potential differences in the perception of tournament winners based on the governing body supervising the competition.