日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Perceptual (but not acoustic) features predict singing voice preferences

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons243246

Bruder,  Camila       
Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons179725

Larrouy-Maestri,  Pauline       
Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck-NYU Center for Language, Music, and Emotion (CLaME);

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Bruder, C., Poeppel, D., & Larrouy-Maestri, P. (2024). Perceptual (but not acoustic) features predict singing voice preferences. Scientific Reports, 14:. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58924-9.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-2EBA-D
要旨
Why do we prefer some singers to others? We investigated how much singing voice preferences can be traced back to objective features of the stimuli. To do so, we asked participants to rate short excerpts of singing performances in terms of how much they liked them as well as in terms of 10 perceptual attributes (e.g.: pitch accuracy, tempo, breathiness). We modeled liking ratings based on these perceptual ratings, as well as based on acoustic features and low-level features derived from Music Information Retrieval (MIR). Mean liking ratings for each stimulus were highly correlated between Experiments 1 (online, US-based participants) and 2 (in the lab, German participants), suggesting a role for attributes of the stimuli in grounding average preferences. We show that acoustic and MIR features barely explain any variance in liking ratings; in contrast, perceptual features of the voices achieved around 43% of prediction. Inter-rater agreement in liking and perceptual ratings was low, indicating substantial (and unsurprising) individual differences in participants’ preferences and perception of the stimuli. Our results indicate that singing voice preferences are not grounded in acoustic attributes of the voices per se, but in how these features are perceptually interpreted by listeners.