English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

How well does surface magnetism represent deep Sun-like star dynamo action?

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons103859

Cameron,  R.
Department Solar and Stellar Interiors, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Finley, A. J., Brun, A. S., Strugarek, A., & Cameron, R. (2024). How well does surface magnetism represent deep Sun-like star dynamo action? Astronomy and Astrophysics, 684, A92. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347862.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-37F6-E
Abstract
Context. For Sun-like stars, the generation of toroidal magnetic field from poloidal magnetic field is an essential piece of the dynamo mechanism powering their magnetism. Previous authors have estimated the net toroidal flux generated in each hemisphere of the Sun by exploiting its conservative nature. This only requires observations of the photospheric magnetic field and surface differential rotation.
Aims: We explore this approach using a 3D magnetohydrodynamic dynamo simulation of a cool star, for which the magnetic field and its generation are precisely known throughout the entire star.
Methods: Changes to the net toroidal flux in each hemisphere were evaluated using a closed line integral bounding the cross-sectional area of each hemisphere, following the application of Stokes theorem to the induction equation; the individual line segments correspond to the stellar surface, base, equator, and rotation axis. We evaluated the influence of the large-scale flows, the fluctuating flows, and magnetic diffusion on each of the line segments, along with their depth-dependence.
Results: In the simulation, changes to the net toroidal flux via the surface line segment typically dominate the total line integral surrounding each hemisphere, with smaller contributions from the equator and rotation axis. The surface line integral is governed primarily by the large-scale flows, and the diffusive current; the latter acting like a flux emergence term due to the use of an impenetrable upper boundary in the simulation. The bulk of the toroidal flux is generated deep inside the convection zone, with the surface observables capturing this due to the conservative nature of the net flux.
Conclusions: Surface magnetism and rotation can be used to produce an estimate of the net toroidal flux generated in each hemisphere, allowing us to constrain the reservoir of magnetic flux for the next magnetic cycle. However, this methodology cannot identify the physical origin or the location of the toroidal flux generation. In addition, not all dynamo mechanisms depend on the net toroidal field produced in each hemisphere, meaning this method may not be able to characterise every magnetic cycle.