日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Different states of synaptic vesicle priming explain target cell type–dependent differences in neurotransmitter release

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons15570

Neher,  Erwin       
Emeritus Group of Membrane Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

aldahabi-et-al-2024
(出版社版), 5MB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Aldahabi, M., Neher, E., & Nusser, Z. (2024). Different states of synaptic vesicle priming explain target cell type–dependent differences in neurotransmitter release. PNAS, 121(18):. doi:10.1073/pnas.2322550121.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-3B67-C
要旨
Pronounced differences in neurotransmitter release from a given presynaptic neuron, depending on the synaptic target, are among the most intriguing features of cortical networks. Hippocampal pyramidal cells (PCs) release glutamate with low probability to somatostatin expressing oriens-lacunosum-moleculare (O-LM) interneurons (INs), and the postsynaptic responses show robust short-term facilitation, whereas the release from the same presynaptic axons onto fast-spiking INs (FSINs) is ~10-fold higher and the excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) display depression. The mechanisms underlying these vastly different synaptic behaviors have not been conclusively identified. Here, we applied a combined functional, pharmacological, and modeling approach to address whether the main difference lies in the action potential-evoked fusion or else in upstream priming processes of synaptic vesicles (SVs). A sequential two-step SV priming model was fitted to the peak amplitudes of unitary EPSCs recorded in response to complex trains of presynaptic stimuli in acute hippocampal slices of adult mice. At PC–FSIN connections, the fusion probability (Pfusion) of well-primed SVs is 0.6, and 44% of docked SVs are in a fusion-competent state. At PC–O-LM synapses, Pfusion is only 40% lower (0.36), whereas the fraction of well-primed SVs is 6.5-fold smaller. Pharmacological enhancement of fusion by 4-AP and priming by PDBU was recaptured by the model with a selective increase of Pfusion and the fraction of well-primed SVs, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the low fidelity of transmission at PC–O-LM synapses can be explained by a low occupancy of the release sites by well-primed SVs.