The Tax-Elasticity of Tangible Fixed Assets: Heterogeneous Effects of 
Homogeneous Tax Policy Changes

Thunecke, Georg; Mc Auliffe, Sean; Wamser, Georg

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_3588179_2

DetailsSummary

Released

Paper

The Tax-Elasticity of Tangible Fixed Assets: Heterogeneous Effects of Homogeneous Tax Policy Changes

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons297634

Thunecke, Georg
Public Economics, MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Thunecke, G., Mc Auliffe, S., & Wamser, G. (2023). The Tax-Elasticity of Tangible Fixed Assets: Heterogeneous Effects of Homogeneous Tax Policy Changes. Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, No. 2023-25.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-3E02-A

Abstract

This paper develops a new approach to calculate country-industry-year-specific forward-looking effective tax rates (FLETRs) based on a panel of 19 industries, 221 countries, and the years 2001 to 2020. Besides statutory corporate tax rate and tax base determinants, the FLETRs account for typical country-industry-specific financing structures as well as asset compositions. We show that FLETRs suffer from significant measurement error when the latter information is neglected, owing primarily to inappropriately assigned asset weights to statutory depreciation allowances.

Our empirical analysis exploits the substantial variation in FLETRs over time to provide estimates of the tax semi-elasticity of corporate investment in tangible fixed assets. Based on more than 24 million firm-entity observations, our results suggest a statistically significant tax semi-elasticity of -0.41, which is at the lower end of previous findings. We further show that different subgroups of firms respond very heterogeneously to tax incentives.