A Response to Our Reviewers

Baccaro, Lucio; Blyth, Mark; Pontusson, Jonas

doi:10.1425/112853

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

A Response to Our Reviewers

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons208776

Baccaro, Lucio
Politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1425/112853
(出版社版)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

公開されているフルテキストはありません

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Baccaro, L., Blyth, M., & Pontusson, J. (2023). A Response to Our Reviewers. Stato e Mercato, (129), 497-504. doi:10.1425/112853.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-3E16-4

要旨

This essay responds to the critiques raised by Anke Hassel and Roberto Pedersini by focusing on four themes: the innovativeness (or not) of the growth models (GM) perspective, the need to integrate demand-side and supply-side considerations in the analysis of comparative capitalism, the relationship of the GM perspective to Post-Keynesian economics, and the role of agency and politics.