日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Improving MR axon radius estimation in human white matter using spiral acquisition and field monitoring

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons189347

Edwards,  Luke       
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons188645

Pine,  Kerrin       
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons147461

Weiskopf,  Nikolaus       
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

Veldmann_2024.pdf
(出版社版), 3MB

付随資料 (公開)

Veldmann_2024_Suppl.docx
(付録資料), 2MB

引用

Veldmann, M., Edwards, L., Pine, K., Ehses, P., Ferreira, M., Weiskopf, N., & Stoecker, T. (2024). Improving MR axon radius estimation in human white matter using spiral acquisition and field monitoring. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. doi:10.1002/mrm.30180.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-5DB8-A
要旨
Purpose: To compare MR axon radius estimation in human white matter using a multiband spiral sequence combined with field monitoring to the current state-of-the-art echo-planar imaging (EPI)-based approach.

Methods: A custom multiband spiral sequence was used for diffusion-weighted imaging at ultra-high b

-values. Field monitoring and higher order image reconstruction were employed to greatly reduce artifacts in spiral images. Diffusion weighting parameters were chosen to match a state-of-the art EPI-based axon radius mapping protocol. The spiral approach was compared to the EPI approach by comparing the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and performing a test-retest study to assess the respective variability and repeatability of axon radius mapping. Effective axon radius estimates were compared over white matter voxels and along the left corticospinal tract.

Results: Increased SNR and reduced artifacts in spiral images led to reduced variability in resulting axon radius maps, especially in low-SNR regions. Test-retest variability was reduced by a factor of approximately 1.5 using the spiral approach. Reduced repeatability due to significant bias was found for some subjects in both spiral and EPI approaches, and attributed to scanner instability, pointing to a previously unknown limitation of the state-of-the-art approach.

Conclusion: Combining spiral readouts with field monitoring improved mapping of the effective axon radius compared to the conventional EPI approach.