日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Cognitive influences on biosecurity measure compliance during a global pandemic

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons275650

Friehs,  Maximilian
Research Group Psychology of Conflict Risk and Safety, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands;
School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Ireland;
Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

JaraRizzo_2024.pdf
(出版社版), 457KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Jara-Rizzo, M. F., Soria-Miranda, N., Friehs, M., Leon-Rojas, J. E., & Rodas, J. A. (2024). Cognitive influences on biosecurity measure compliance during a global pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 15:. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1306015.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-6664-E
要旨
Introduction: During the first years of the pandemic, COVID-19 forced governments worldwide to take drastic measures to reduce the spread of the virus. Some of these measures included mandatory confinements, constant use of masks, and social distancing. Despite these measures being mandatory in many countries and the abundance of evidence on their effectiveness at slowing the spread of the virus, many people failed to comply with them.

Methods: This research explored the role of cognitive factors in predicting compliance with COVID-19 safety measures across two separate studies. Building on earlier work demonstrating the relevance of cognitive processes in health behaviour, this study aimed to identify key predictors of adherence to safety guidelines during the pandemic. Utilising hierarchical regression models, we investigated the influence of age, sex, cognitive control, cognitive flexibility (Study 1), working memory, psychological health, and beliefs about COVID-19 (Study 2) on compliance to biosafety measures.

Results: Demographic variables and cognitive control were significant predictors of compliance in both studies. However, cognitive flexibility and working memory did not improve the models' predictive capacities. In Study 2, integrating measures of psychological health and beliefs regarding COVID-19 severity significantly improved the model. Further, interaction effects between age and other variables also enhanced the predictive value.

Discussion: The findings emphasise the significant role cognitive control, age, psychological health, and perceptions about COVID-19 play in shaping compliance behaviour, highlighting avenues for targeted interventions to improve public health outcomes during a pandemic.