日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Highly nonlinear photodamage in two-photon fluorescence microscopy

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons15246

Hopt,  A.
Department of Membrane Biophysics, MPI for biophysical chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons15570

Neher,  E.
Department of Membrane Biophysics, MPI for biophysical chemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Hopt, A., & Neher, E. (2001). Highly nonlinear photodamage in two-photon fluorescence microscopy. Biophysical Journal, 80(4), 2029-2036. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76173-5.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-F641-F
要旨
Two-photon fluorescence excitation is being increasingly used in laser scan microscopy due to very low photodamage induced by this technique under normal operation. However, excitation intensity has to be kept low, because nonlinear photodamage sets in when laser power is increased above a certain threshold. We studied this kind of damage in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells, using two different indicators of damage: changes in resting [Ca2+] level and the degranulation reaction. In agreement with previous studies, we found that, for both criteria, damage is proportional to the integral (over space and time) of light intensity raised to a power ≈ 2.5. Thus, widening the laser pulse shape at constant average intensity both in time and in focal volume is beneficial for avoiding this kind of damage. Both measures, of course, reduce the two-photon fluorescence excitation. However, loss of signal can be compensated by increasing excitation power, such that, at constant damaging potential, signals may be even larger with long pulses and large focal volumes, because the exponent of the power law of damage is higher (μ ≈ 2.5) than that of the two-photon signal (μ ≈ 2).