By performing two sets of high-resolution atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) experiments, the authors find that the atmospheric response to a sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly in the extratropical North Pacific is sensitive to decadal variations of the background SST on which the SST anomaly is superimposed. The response in the first set of experiments, in which the SST anomaly is superimposed on the observed daily SST of 1981–90, strongly differs from the response in the second experiment, in which the same SST anomaly is superimposed on the observed daily SST of 1991–2000. The atmospheric response over the North Pacific during 1981–90 is eddy mediated, equivalent barotropic, and concentrated in the east. In contrast, the atmospheric response during 1991–2000 is weaker and strongest in the west. The results are discussed in terms of Rossby wave dynamics, with the proposed primary wave source switching from baroclinic eddy vorticity forcing over the eastern North Pacific in 1981–90 to mean-flow divergence over the western North Pacific in 1991–2000. The wave source changes are linked to the decadal reduction of daily SST variability over the eastern North Pacific and strengthening of the Oyashio Extension front over the western North Pacific. Thus, both daily and frontal aspects of the background SST variability in determining the atmospheric response to extratropical North Pacific SST anomalies are emphasized by these AGCM experiments.
State Dependence of Atmospheric Response to Extratropical North Pacific SST Anomalies
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany Mojib Latif Richard J. GreatbatchAffiliations
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, and Cluster of Excellence “The Future Ocean,” University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany Wonsun ParkAffiliations
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
AMS Single Sign-On Log In
If you have a subscription to the AMS Journals Online content, please click here to login via the AMS single sign-on page and gain access to this content.
If you are interested in Pay Per View or want to log in as an institutional admin, please use the login area below.
Your Access Options
If you have an individual subscription to this content, or if you have purchased this content through Pay Per Article within the past 24 hours, you can gain access by logging in with your username and password here:
Share this Article
Most Read JCLI Articles
(past 12 months)
Newman et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 12
Sensitivity of Satellite-Derived Tropospheric Temperature Trends to the Diurnal Cycle Adjustment (1245 times)
Mears et al.
May 2016, Vol. 29, No. 10
Poli et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 11
Welhouse et al.
March 2016, Vol. 29, No. 5
Cheng et al.
January 2016, Vol. 29, No. 1
Dobricic et al.
April 2016, Vol. 29, No. 8
Most Cited (past 12 months)
1.MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and ApplicationsRienecker et al.July 2011, Vol. 24, No. 14
2.Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)Smith et al.May 2008, Vol. 21, No. 10
3.Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingHeld et al.November 2006, Vol. 19, No. 21
4.A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration IndexVicente-Serrano et al.April 2010, Vol. 23, No. 7
5.An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for ClimateReynolds et al.July 2002, Vol. 15, No. 13
6.Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface TemperatureReynolds et al.November 2007, Vol. 20, No. 22