%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<>>>/BBox[0 0 609.45 793.7]/Length 136>>stream
xͱ
0=OqF:J-8CFM&&hf9;I+ !![ت_gjuz~rM 1#infT ϏB7 zkٱ$%2%'
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<>>>/BBox[0 0 609.45 793.7]/Length 136>>stream
xͱ
0=OqF:J-8CFM&&hf9;I+ !![ت_gjuz~rM 1#infT ϏB7 zkٱ$%2%'
endstream
endobj
4 0 obj
<>>>/BBox[0 0 609.45 793.7]/Length 136>>stream
xͱ
0=OqF:J-8CFM&&hf9;I+ !![ت_gjuz~rM 1#infT ϏB7 zkٱ$%2%'
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>>>/BBox[0 0 609.45 793.7]/Length 136>>stream
xͱ
0=OqF:J-8CFM&&hf9;I+ !![ت_gjuz~rM 1#infT ϏB7 zkٱ$%2%'
endstream
endobj
7 0 obj
<>stream
Taylor & Francis
Empirical and conceptual challenges for neurocognitive theories of language production
Laurel Brehm
Matthew Goldrick
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2015. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1110604
iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT2017-09-11T09:33:48-07:00
2015-11-09truewww.tandfonline.com10.1080/23273798.2015.1110604www.tandfonline.comtrue2015-11-0910.1080/23273798.2015.1110604
endstream
endobj
8 0 obj
<>stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
9 0 obj
<>stream
xS**T0T0 Bi y8#
endstream
endobj
10 0 obj
<>stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
11 0 obj
<>stream
xS*
R
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
<>stream
xS**T0T0 Bi yS&
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>stream
xS**T0T0 Bi yA$
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>stream
xS**T0T0 Bi yJ%
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<>stream
xZK7%(z? =Fd6c;Yf~HTx.tJG2K)kyAC҉^~)XUK7Pk5EݟՏ0ƝeՉy\w.U2ṃwB3g'?53
oOZ
B-&0x!v[nT0&sh3gR]S&
LղV!C42mYs5|x'k&=+|4m꼻4*U2Q9~~Pow_x)/EP?ݏy10x
;iun读vo/LWTk)Agi( P;0@h
Zz~w|oHs]YѢX.rL)$ot$7'juMfу,s%3>"٢z
F;:]^y]ёmݲ:l8jG]PmmEeM*@T\p!mRYBb~
X3:zpor`Ӂ\0zovV^Oxʎœ-淍mKx3^͚)%{@ZRA@9/36JdbPȠ3EWL21@AĹ"̱
D,:5%@u0C*ú:R
;8X10;[8,I6AG?E@= @qXMh-.!RPE
÷)(@qw%JDew>_&fc