date: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.7
pdf:docinfo:title: Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions
xmp:CreatorTool: Microsoft® Word 2019
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: An agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: Under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational.  (JEL D11, D80, D90)
pdfa:PDFVersion: A-2b
language: de-DE
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.7
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: Microsoft® Word 2019
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions
modified: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
cp:subject: In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: An agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: Under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational.  (JEL D11, D80, D90)
pdf:docinfo:subject: In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: An agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: Under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational.  (JEL D11, D80, D90)
pdf:docinfo:creator: Florian Artinger
meta:author: Florian Artinger
meta:creation-date: 2022-08-29T14:35:35Z
created: 2022-08-29T14:35:35Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
Creation-Date: 2022-08-29T14:35:35Z
pdfaid:part: 2
Author: Florian Artinger
producer: Microsoft® Word 2019
pdf:docinfo:producer: Microsoft® Word 2019
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0
dc:description: In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: An agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: Under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational.  (JEL D11, D80, D90)
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
dc:creator: Florian Artinger
description: In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: An agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: Under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational.  (JEL D11, D80, D90)
dcterms:created: 2022-08-29T14:35:35Z
Last-Modified: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
dcterms:modified: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
title: Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions
xmpMM:DocumentID: uuid:137E2E9F-D66D-4A0B-A104-1A653716FE5B
Last-Save-Date: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
meta:save-date: 2022-08-29T14:36:20Z
Content-Type: application/pdf
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Florian Artinger
pdfaid:conformance: B
dc:language: de-DE
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 39
pdf:charsPerPage: 1873
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:created: 2022-08-29T14:35:35Z