date: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.6
pdf:docinfo:title: When tainted money should fund public goods: fundraising professional and public moral preferences
xmp:CreatorTool: Servigistics Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 11.1.4546/W-x64
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad285; PNAS Nexus, 2, 9, 2023-9-26.; Abstract: Philanthropy is essential to public goods such as education and research, arts and culture, and the provision of services to those in need. Providers of public goods commonly struggle with the dilemma of whether to accept donations from morally tainted donors. Ethicists also disagree on how to manage tainted donations. Forgoing such donations reduces opportunities for societal well-being and advancement; however, accepting them can damage institutional and individual reputations. Half of professional fundraisers have faced tainted donors, but only around a third of their institutions had relevant policies (n?=?52). Here, we draw on two large samples of US laypeople (ns?=?2,019; 2,566) and a unique sample of experts (professional fundraisers, n?=?694) to provide empirical insights into various aspects of tainted donations that affect moral acceptability: the nature of the moral taint (criminal or morally ambiguous
language: en
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.6
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: Servigistics Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 11.1.4546/W-x64
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: When tainted money should fund public goods: fundraising professional and public moral preferences
modified: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
cp:subject: DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad285; PNAS Nexus, 2, 9, 2023-9-26.; Abstract: Philanthropy is essential to public goods such as education and research, arts and culture, and the provision of services to those in need. Providers of public goods commonly struggle with the dilemma of whether to accept donations from morally tainted donors. Ethicists also disagree on how to manage tainted donations. Forgoing such donations reduces opportunities for societal well-being and advancement; however, accepting them can damage institutional and individual reputations. Half of professional fundraisers have faced tainted donors, but only around a third of their institutions had relevant policies (n?=?52). Here, we draw on two large samples of US laypeople (ns?=?2,019; 2,566) and a unique sample of experts (professional fundraisers, n?=?694) to provide empirical insights into various aspects of tainted donations that affect moral acceptability: the nature of the moral taint (criminal or morally ambiguous
pdf:docinfo:subject: DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad285; PNAS Nexus, 2, 9, 2023-9-26.; Abstract: Philanthropy is essential to public goods such as education and research, arts and culture, and the provision of services to those in need. Providers of public goods commonly struggle with the dilemma of whether to accept donations from morally tainted donors. Ethicists also disagree on how to manage tainted donations. Forgoing such donations reduces opportunities for societal well-being and advancement; however, accepting them can damage institutional and individual reputations. Half of professional fundraisers have faced tainted donors, but only around a third of their institutions had relevant policies (n?=?52). Here, we draw on two large samples of US laypeople (ns?=?2,019; 2,566) and a unique sample of experts (professional fundraisers, n?=?694) to provide empirical insights into various aspects of tainted donations that affect moral acceptability: the nature of the moral taint (criminal or morally ambiguous
pdf:docinfo:creator: Zoe Rahwan
meta:author: Christina Leuker
meta:creation-date: 2023-09-22T13:58:47Z
created: 2023-09-22T13:58:47Z
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
Creation-Date: 2023-09-22T13:58:47Z
Author: Christina Leuker
producer: PDFlib+PDI 9.0.7p3 (C++/Win64); modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:docinfo:producer: PDFlib+PDI 9.0.7p3 (C++/Win64); modified using iTextSharp 4.1.6 by 1T3XT
pdf:docinfo:custom:EPSprocessor: PStill version 1.84.42
pdf:unmappedUnicodeCharsPerPage: 0
dc:description: DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad285; PNAS Nexus, 2, 9, 2023-9-26.; Abstract: Philanthropy is essential to public goods such as education and research, arts and culture, and the provision of services to those in need. Providers of public goods commonly struggle with the dilemma of whether to accept donations from morally tainted donors. Ethicists also disagree on how to manage tainted donations. Forgoing such donations reduces opportunities for societal well-being and advancement; however, accepting them can damage institutional and individual reputations. Half of professional fundraisers have faced tainted donors, but only around a third of their institutions had relevant policies (n?=?52). Here, we draw on two large samples of US laypeople (ns?=?2,019; 2,566) and a unique sample of experts (professional fundraisers, n?=?694) to provide empirical insights into various aspects of tainted donations that affect moral acceptability: the nature of the moral taint (criminal or morally ambiguous
Keywords: moral decision-making; moral preferences; tainted money; philanthropy; moral emotions
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
dc:creator: Christina Leuker
description: DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad285; PNAS Nexus, 2, 9, 2023-9-26.; Abstract: Philanthropy is essential to public goods such as education and research, arts and culture, and the provision of services to those in need. Providers of public goods commonly struggle with the dilemma of whether to accept donations from morally tainted donors. Ethicists also disagree on how to manage tainted donations. Forgoing such donations reduces opportunities for societal well-being and advancement; however, accepting them can damage institutional and individual reputations. Half of professional fundraisers have faced tainted donors, but only around a third of their institutions had relevant policies (n?=?52). Here, we draw on two large samples of US laypeople (ns?=?2,019; 2,566) and a unique sample of experts (professional fundraisers, n?=?694) to provide empirical insights into various aspects of tainted donations that affect moral acceptability: the nature of the moral taint (criminal or morally ambiguous
dcterms:created: 2023-09-22T13:58:47Z
Last-Modified: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
dcterms:modified: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
title: When tainted money should fund public goods: fundraising professional and public moral preferences
xmpMM:DocumentID: uuid:C5D32291-077E-606F-E553-C5FCEE8A6F8B
Last-Save-Date: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
pdf:docinfo:keywords: moral decision-making; moral preferences; tainted money; philanthropy; moral emotions
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
meta:save-date: 2023-09-27T11:32:33Z
Content-Type: application/pdf
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Christina Leuker
EPSprocessor: PStill version 1.84.42
dc:language: en
dc:subject: moral decision-making; moral preferences; tainted money; philanthropy; moral emotions
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 15
pdf:charsPerPage: 5394
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
meta:keyword: moral decision-making; moral preferences; tainted money; philanthropy; moral emotions
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:created: 2023-09-22T13:58:47Z