English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Delay as a Political Technique under Divided Government? Empirical Evidence from Germany, 1976-2005

Manow, P., & Burkhart, S. (2008). Delay as a Political Technique under Divided Government? Empirical Evidence from Germany, 1976-2005. German Politics, 17(3), 353-366. doi:10.1080/09644000802300650.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
GP_17_2008_Manow.pdf (Any fulltext), 330KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
GP_17_2008_Manow.pdf
Description:
Full text
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, MKGS; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000802300650 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Manow, Philip1, Author           
Burkhart, Simone1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Politik und politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This article analyses whether the majority situation of Germany’s second
chamber has an impact on the duration of the legislative process. While it is
often assumed that diverging majorities between Bundestag and Bundesrat
delay law-making, the little empirical research that exists could not confirm
such an effect of divided government. We therefore seek to discover whether
and how an oppositional majority in the Bundesrat can credibly threaten to
delay the legislative process for an undue length of time. Our study is based
on a comprehensive dataset featuring a wealth of information on all bills
adopted between 1976 and 2005. We show that divided government delays legislation,
but to a somewhat lesser extent than often assumed. We show that under
divided government the federal government loses some of its power over the parliamentary
calendar – with possible consequences for its ability to implement its
political agenda. Interestingly, this finding is not limited to bills that require the
consent of the second chamber, but applies to all bills.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2008-09-092008
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: Introduction
Political control of the parliamentary calendar
Operationalisation data and summary statistics
Testing the hypotheses
Summary
Footnotes
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 402148
DOI: 10.1080/09644000802300650
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: German Politics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 17 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 353 - 366 Identifier: ISSN: 0964-4008
ISSN: 1743-8993

Source 2

show
hide
Title: Between Consensus and Conflict: Law-Making Processes in Germany
Source Genre: Issue
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -