English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Psychophysical comparison of synthesis algorithms for natural images

Nielsen, K., Logothetis, N., & Rainer, G.(2003). Psychophysical comparison of synthesis algorithms for natural images (119). Tübingen, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DAA5-F Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-8B41-8
Genre: Report

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
MPIK-TR-119.pdf (Publisher version), 379KB
Name:
MPIK-TR-119.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Nielsen, K1, 2, Author              
Logothetis, NK1, 2, Author              
Rainer, G1, 2, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497798              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In this study, we used three computational algorithms to compute basis sets for natural image patches, such that each patch could be synthesized as a linear combination of basis functions. The two biologically plausible algorithms non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and sparsenet (SPN) were compared to standard principal component analysis (PCA). We assessed human psychophysical performance at identifying natural image patches synthesized using different basis set sizes in each of the algorithms. We also computed the reconstruction error, which represents a simple objective measure of synthesis performance. We found that the reconstruction error was a good predictor of human psychophysical performance. Performance was best for PCA, followed by NMF and SPN despite large differences in basis function characteristics. All algorithms were well able to generalize to represent novel natural image patches. When applied to white noise patches instead of natural images, PCA and SPN outperformed NMF. This shows that of the three algorithms the one that is least biologically plausible (PCA) actually supported best psychophysical performance, suggesting that in the present study it is low-level quality of reconstruction that is the main determinant of psychophysical performance.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2003-12
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: 22
 Publishing info: Tübingen, Germany : Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: Report Nr.: 119
BibTex Citekey: 2075
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 119 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -