Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
 Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht
  Psychophysical comparison of synthesis algorithms for natural images

Nielsen, K., Logothetis, N., & Rainer, G.(2003). Psychophysical comparison of synthesis algorithms for natural images (119). Tübingen, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DAA5-F Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-8B41-8
Genre: Bericht

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
MPIK-TR-119.pdf (Verlagsversion), 379KB
Öffnen   Speichern
Datei-Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-8B42-7
Name:
MPIK-TR-119.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Öffnen
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Nielsen, K1, 2, Autor           
Logothetis, NK1, 2, Autor           
Rainer, G1, 2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497798              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: In this study, we used three computational algorithms to compute basis sets for natural
image patches, such that each patch could be synthesized as a linear combination of basis functions.
The two biologically plausible algorithms non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and sparsenet
(SPN) were compared to standard principal component analysis (PCA). We assessed human
psychophysical performance at identifying natural image patches synthesized using different basis set
sizes in each of the algorithms. We also computed the reconstruction error, which represents a simple
objective measure of synthesis performance. We found that the reconstruction error was a good
predictor of human psychophysical performance. Performance was best for PCA, followed by NMF
and SPN despite large differences in basis function characteristics. All algorithms were well able to
generalize to represent novel natural image patches. When applied to white noise patches instead of
natural images, PCA and SPN outperformed NMF. This shows that of the three algorithms the one
that is least biologically plausible (PCA) actually supported best psychophysical performance,
suggesting that in the present study it is low-level quality of reconstruction that is the main
determinant of psychophysical performance.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2003-12
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: 22
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Tübingen, Germany : Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: Reportnr.: 119
BibTex Citekey: 2075
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Genre der Quelle: Reihe
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 119 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -