English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon

Seuren, P. A. M., & Jaspers, D. (2014). Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon. Language, 90(3), 607-643. doi:10.1353/lan.2014.0058.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-B39C-D Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0023-F3A2-C
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Seuren_2014_lg.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Seuren_2014_lg.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Seuren, Pieter A. M.1, Author              
Jaspers, Dany2, Author
Affiliations:
1Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55217              
2KU Leuven HUBrussel, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This study is a prolegomenon to a formal theory of the natural growth of conceptual and lexical fields. Negation, in the various forms in which it occurs in language, is found to be a powerful indicator. Other than in standard logic, natural language negation selects its complement within universes of discourse that are, for practical and functional reasons, restricted in various ways and to different degrees. It is hypothesized that a system of cognitive principles drives recursive processes of universe restriction, which in turn affects logical relations within the restricted universes. This approach provides a new perspective in which to view the well-known clashes between standard logic and natural logical intuitions. Lexicalization in language, especially the morphological incorporation of negation, is limited to highly restricted universes, which explains, for example, why a dog can be said not to be a Catholic, but also not to be a non-Catholic. Cognition is taken to restrict the universe of discourse to contrary pairs, splitting up one or both of the contraries into further subuniverses as a result of further cognitive activity. It is shown how a logically sound square of opposition , expanded to a hexagon (Jacoby 1950, 1960, Sesmat 1951, Blanché 1952, 1953, 1966), is generated by a hierarchy of universe restrictions, defining the notion ‘natural’ for logical systems. The logical hexagon contains two additional vertices, one for ‘some but not all’ (the Y-type) and one for ‘either all or none’ (the U-type), and incorporates both the classic square and the Hamiltonian triangle of contraries . Some is thus considered semantically ambiguous, representing two distinct quantifiers. The pragmaticist claim that the language system contains only the standard logical ‘some perhaps all’ and that the ‘some but not all’ meaning is pragmatically derived from the use of the system is rejected. Four principles are proposed according to which negation selects a complement from the subuniverses at hand. On the basis of these principles and of the logico-cognitive system proposed, the well-known nonlexicalization not only of *nall and *nand but also of many other nonlogical cases found throughout the lexicons of languages is analyzed and explained

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20142014
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0058
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 90 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 607 - 643 Identifier: ISSN: 0097-8507
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925466254