English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Language contact does not drive gesture transfer: Heritage speakers maintain language specific gesture patterns in each language

Azar, Z., Backus, A., & Ozyurek, A. (2020). Language contact does not drive gesture transfer: Heritage speakers maintain language specific gesture patterns in each language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 414-428. doi:10.1017/S136672891900018X.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Azar_Backus_Ozyurek_2020_Language contact does not drive....pdf (Publisher version), 492KB
Name:
Azar_Backus_Ozyurek_2020_Language contact does not drive....pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2019
Copyright Info:
© The Author(s) 2019 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Azar, Zeynep1, Author           
Backus, Ad2, Author
Ozyurek, Asli1, 3, 4, 5, Author           
Affiliations:
1Center for Language Studies , External Organizations, ou_55238              
2Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
3Research Associates, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_2344700              
4Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              
5Multimodal Language and Cognition, Radboud University Nijmegen, External Organizations, ou_3055480              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This paper investigates whether there are changes in gesture rate when speakers of two languages with different gesture rates (Turkish-high gesture; Dutch-low gesture) come into daily contact. We analyzed gestures produced by second-generation heritage speakers of Turkish in the Netherlands in each language, comparing them to monolingual baselines. We did not find differences between bilingual and monolingual speakers, possibly because bilinguals were proficient in both languages and used them frequently – in line with a usage-based approach to language. However, bilinguals produced more deictic gestures than monolinguals in both Turkish and Dutch, which we interpret as a bilingual strategy. Deictic gestures may help organize discourse by placing entities in gesture space and help reduce the cognitive load associated with being bilingual, e.g., inhibition cost. Therefore, gesture rate does not necessarily change in contact situations but might be modulated by frequency of language use, proficiency, and cognitive factors related to being bilingual.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20192019-04-302020-03
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1017/S136672891900018X
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge University Press / UK
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 23 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 414 - 428 Identifier: ISSN: 1366-7289
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925343779