English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
 Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary
  Reply to "Comment on `Appearance and disappearance of the second Born effects in the (e,3e) reaction on He' "

Dorn, A., Kheifets, A., Schröter, C. D., Höhr, C., Sakhelashvili, G., Moshammer, R., et al. (2005). Reply to "Comment on `Appearance and disappearance of the second Born effects in the (e,3e) reaction on He' ". Physical Review A, 71: 026702, pp. 1-3. Retrieved from http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v71/e026702.

Item is

 

show all hide all

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-8976-C Version Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-8977-A
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
pra_dorn.pdf (Preprint), 329KB
View   Save
File Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-8975-E
Name:
pra_dorn.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
View
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: PUBLIC
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Dorn, A.1, Author           
Kheifets, A.1, Author           
Schröter, C. D.1, Author           
Höhr, C.1, Author           
Sakhelashvili, G.2, Author           
Moshammer, R.1, Author           
Lower, J.3, Author
Ullrich, J.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_904547              
2Division Prof. Dr. Werner Hofmann, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_904550              
3Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Department of Physics, Tbilisi State University, 380028 Tbilisi, Georgia, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: 34.80.Dp
 Abstract: In this Reply, we demonstrate that at large momentum transfer (|q| = 2 a.u.), within the experimentally accessible angular range of the ionized electrons, there is good agreement between experiment and the first Born calculation concerning the shape of the cross section. Furthermore, we show that the fact that our results for (e,3e) double ionization seemingly "contradict well-accepted results in (e,2e) single ionization" can be traced to a second Born process in which the projectile interacts with both target electrons in sequence. This process competes effectively with other double ionization mechanisms but is relatively unimportant for single ionization.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2005-02-22
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 206686
URI: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v71/e026702
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Physical Review A
  Alternative Title : Phys. Rev. A
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 71 Sequence Number: 026702 Start / End Page: 1 - 3 Identifier: -