English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Systematic Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Basin Hopping Approaches to the Global Optimization of Si(111) Surface Reconstructions

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons267477

Panosetti,  Chiara
Theory, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;
Technical University of Munich;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

acs.jpca.2c00647.pdf
(Publisher version), 5MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bauer, M. N., Probert, M. I. J., & Panosetti, C. (2022). Systematic Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Basin Hopping Approaches to the Global Optimization of Si(111) Surface Reconstructions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 126(19), 3043-3056. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.2c00647.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-6DDE-3
Abstract
We present a systematic study of two widely used material structure prediction methods, the Genetic Algorithm and Basin Hopping approaches to global optimization, in a search for the 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7 reconstructions of the Si(111) surface. The Si(111) 7 × 7 reconstruction is the largest and most complex surface reconstruction known, and finding it is a very exacting test for global optimization methods. In this paper, we introduce a modification to previous Genetic Algorithm work on structure search for periodic systems, to allow the efficient search for surface reconstructions, and present a rigorous study of the effect of the different parameters of the algorithm. We also perform a detailed comparison with the recently improved Basin Hopping algorithm using Delocalized Internal Coordinates. Both algorithms succeeded in either resolving the 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7 DAS surface reconstructions or getting “sufficiently close”, i.e., identifying structures that only differ for the positions of a few atoms as well as thermally accessible structures within kBT/unit area of the global minimum, with T = 300 K. Overall, the Genetic Algorithm is more robust with respect to parameter choice and in success rate, while the Basin Hopping method occasionally exhibits some advantages in speed of convergence. In line with previous studies, the results confirm that robustness, success, and speed of convergence of either approach are strongly influenced by how much the trial moves tend to preserve favorable bonding patterns once these appear.