English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Unboundedness Problems for Machines with Reversal-bounded Counters

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons274580

Baumann,  Pascal
Group G. Zetzsche, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons266088

Ganardi,  Moses
Group G. Zetzsche, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons276235

Schütze,  Lia
Group G. Zetzsche, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons230970

Zetzsche,  Georg
Group G. Zetzsche, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

arXiv:2301.10198.pdf
(Preprint), 798KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Baumann, P., D'Alessandro, F., Ganardi, M., Ibarra, O., McQuillan, I., Schütze, L., et al. (2023). Unboundedness Problems for Machines with Reversal-bounded Counters. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10198.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-B70E-7
Abstract
We consider a general class of decision problems concerning formal languages,
called ``(one-dimensional) unboundedness predicates'', for automata that
feature reversal-bounded counters (RBCA). We show that each problem in this
class reduces -- non-deterministically in polynomial time -- to the same
problem for just finite automata. We also show an analogous reduction for
automata that have access to both a pushdown stack and reversal-bounded
counters (PRBCA).
This allows us to answer several open questions: For example, we show that it
is coNP-complete to decide whether a given (P)RBCA language $L$ is bounded,
meaning whether there exist words $w_1,\ldots,w_n$ with $L\subseteq w_1^*\cdots
w_n^*$. For PRBCA, even decidability was open. Our methods also show that there
is no language of a (P)RBCA of intermediate growth. This means, the number of
words of each length grows either polynomially or exponentially. Part of our
proof is likely of independent interest: We show that one can translate an RBCA
into a machine with $\mathbb{Z}$-counters in logarithmic space, while
preserving the accepted language.