English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Social VR design features and experiential outcomes: Narrative review and relationship map for dyadic agent conversations

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons275650

Friehs,  Maximilian
School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Ireland;
University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands;
Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Mulvaney_2024.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mulvaney, P., Rooney, B., Friehs, M., & Leader, J. F. (2024). Social VR design features and experiential outcomes: Narrative review and relationship map for dyadic agent conversations. Virtual Reality, 28(1): 45. doi:10.1007/s10055-024-00941-0.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-0666-8
Abstract
The application of virtual reality to the study of conversation and social interaction is a relatively new field of study. While the affordances of VR in the domain compared to traditional methods are promising, the current state of the field is plagued by a lack of methodological standards and shared understanding of how design features of the immersive experience impact participants. In order to address this, this paper develops a relationship map between design features and experiential outcomes, along with expectations for how those features interact with each other. Based on the results of a narrative review drawing from diverse fields, this relationship map focuses on dyadic conversations with agents. The experiential outcomes chosen include presence & engagement, psychological discomfort, and simulator sickness. The relevant design features contained in the framework include scenario agency, visual fidelity, agent automation, environmental context, and audio features. We conclude by discussing the findings of the review and framework, such as the multimodal nature of social VR being highlighted, and the importance of environmental context, and lastly provide recommendations for future research in social VR.