A Response to Our Reviewers

Baccaro, Lucio; Blyth, Mark; Pontusson, Jonas

doi:10.1425/112853

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

A Response to Our Reviewers

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons208776

Baccaro, Lucio
Politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1425/112853
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

SeM_2023_Baccaro.PDF
(Any fulltext), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Baccaro, L., Blyth, M., & Pontusson, J. (2023). A Response to Our Reviewers. Stato e Mercato, (129), 497-504. doi:10.1425/112853.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-3E16-4

Abstract

This essay responds to the critiques raised by Anke Hassel and Roberto Pedersini by focusing on four themes: the innovativeness (or not) of the growth models (GM) perspective, the need to integrate demand-side and supply-side considerations in the analysis of comparative capitalism, the relationship of the GM perspective to Post-Keynesian economics, and the role of agency and politics.