English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Professionals and Populists: The Making of a Free Market for Medicine in the United States, 1787–1860

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons200561

Habinek,  Jacob
Soziologie des Marktes, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Institute for Analytical Sociology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Habinek, J., & Haveman, H. A. (2019). Professionals and Populists: The Making of a Free Market for Medicine in the United States, 1787–1860. Socio-Economic Review, (published online February 4). doi:10.1093/ser/mwy052.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-F233-3
Abstract
In the early decades of the 19th century, physicians in the USA enjoyed unquestioned
authority in medicine and increasing state recognition. But by mid-century,
their monopoly had given way to a raucous free market for medical care. To explain
the causes and consequences of this dismantling of a professional monopoly, we
draw on political sociology. We argue that to maintain a monopoly, a dominant profession
must defend its cultural authority against rival claims and preserve its institutional
support from the state. A dominant profession can lose its monopoly if rival
occupations mobilize to challenge its cultural authority and if populist political coalitions
mobilize to repeal laws upholding professional monopolies. Our analysis,
which covers all states in the Union by 1860, reveals that the dynamics of contention,
both within the system of professions and in the wider political arena, can
erode the foundations of professional monopolies.