English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

An adaptive h-refinement method for the boundary element fast multipole method for quasi-static electromagnetic modeling

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons212471

Weise,  Konstantin       
Methods and Development Group Brain Networks, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Wartmann_2024.pdf
(Publisher version), 13MB

Wartman_pre.pdf
(Preprint), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)

Wartmann_2024_Suppl.docx
(Supplementary material), 842KB

Citation

Wartman, W. A., Weise, K., Rachh, M., Morales, L., Deng, Z.-D., Nummenmaa, A., et al. (2024). An adaptive h-refinement method for the boundary element fast multipole method for quasi-static electromagnetic modeling. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 69(5): 055030. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad2638.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-A2F8-4
Abstract
Objective.In our recent work pertinent to modeling of brain stimulation and neurophysiological recordings, substantial modeling errors in the computed electric field and potential have sometimes been observed for standard multi-compartment head models. The goal of this study is to quantify those errors and, further, eliminate them through an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithm. The study concentrates on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), and electroencephalography (EEG) forward problems.Approach.We propose, describe, and systematically investigate an AMR method using the boundary element method with fast multipole acceleration (BEM-FMM) as the base numerical solver. The goal is to efficiently allocate additional unknowns to critical areas of the model, where they will best improve solution accuracy. The implemented AMR method's accuracy improvement is measured on head models constructed from 16 Human Connectome Project subjects under problem classes of TES, TMS, and EEG. Errors are computed between three solutions: an initial non-adaptive solution, a solution found after applying AMR with a conservative refinement rate, and a 'silver-standard' solution found by subsequent 4:1 global refinement of the adaptively-refined model.Main results.Excellent agreement is shown between the adaptively-refined and silver-standard solutions for standard head models. AMR is found to be vital for accurate modeling of TES and EEG forward problems for standard models: an increase of less than 25% (on average) in number of mesh elements for these problems, efficiently allocated by AMR, exposes electric field/potential errors exceeding 60% (on average) in the solution for the unrefined models.Significance.This error has especially important implications for TES dosing prediction-where the stimulation strength plays a central role-and for EEG lead fields. Though the specific form of the AMR method described here is implemented for the BEM-FMM, we expect that AMR is applicable and even required for accurate electromagnetic simulations by other numerical modeling packages as well.