Researcher Portfolio
Schulze, Christin
Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society
Researcher Profile
Position: Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society
Additional IDs: ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6572-3486
Researcher ID: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons179681
External references
WorldCat
Search for Schulze, Christin
Google Scholar
Search for Schulze, Christin
Publications
: Thoma, A. I., Newell, B. R., & Schulze, C. (in press). Emerging adaptivity in probability learning: How young minds and the environment interact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. [PubMan] : Hecht, M., Schulze, C., & Pachur, T. (in press). Models of social sampling. In T. Reimer, L. van Swol, & A. Florack (Eds. ), The Routledge handbook of communication and social cognition. London: Routledge. [PubMan] : Thoma, A. I., & Schulze, C. (2025). Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 251: 106126. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106126. [PubMan] : Hechtlinger, S., Schulze, C., Leuker, C., & Hertwig, R. (2024). The psychology of life's most important decisions. American Psychologist. doi:10.1037/amp0001439. [PubMan] : Pachur, T., & Schulze, C. (2023). Heuristic social sampling. In K. Fiedler, P. Juslin, & J. Denrell (Eds. ), Sampling in judgment and decision making (pp. 359-384). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Hertwig, R. (2022). Experiencing statistical information improves children’s and adults’ inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 2302-2313. doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02075-3. [PubMan] : Hecht, M., Pachur, T., & Schulze, C. (2022). Does social sampling differ between online and offline contacts? A computational modeling analysis. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds. ), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 319-325). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0c161487. [PubMan] : Stephensen, M. B., Schulze, C., Landrø, M., Hendrikx, J., & Hetland, A. (2021). Should I judge safety or danger? Perceived risk depends on the question frame. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(3), 485-502. doi:10.1037/xap0000354. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (2021). Who you know is what you know: Modeling boundedly rational social sampling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 221-241. doi:10.1037/xge0000799. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., Hertwig, R., & Weyland, M. (2021). Warum können Babys und Schimpansen mit Wahrscheinlichkeiten umgehen, Erwachsene aber nicht? MINT Zirkel, 10(3), 3-3. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., Hertwig, R., & Weyland, M. (2021). Wie Experimente menschliche Rationalität hervor- und wegzaubern. Unterricht Wirtschaft + Politik, 11(3), 6-11. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Hertwig, R. (2021). A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups. Cognition, 210: 104580. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104580. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., Gaissmaier, W., & Newell, B. R. (2020). Maximizing as satisficing: On pattern matching and probability maximizing in groups and individuals. Cognition, 205: 104382. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104382. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., James, G., Koehler, D. J., & Newell, B. R. (2019). Probability matching does not decrease under cognitive load: A preregistered failure to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 47(3), 511-518. doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0888-3. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Pachur, T. (2019). Going round in circles: How social structures guide and limit search. In Taming uncertainty (pp. 71-88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2018). Decision making under risk: An experience-based perspective. In L. J. Ball, & V. A. Thompson (Eds. ), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 502-522). London: Routledge. [PubMan] : Newell, B. R., & Schulze, C. (2017). Probability matching. In R. F. Pohl (Ed. ), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment, and memory (2nd ed., pp. 62-78). London: Routledge. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Newell, B. R. (2017). Hold it! The influence of lingering rewards on choice diversification and persistence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1752-1767. doi:10.1037/xlm0000407. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2017). How does instance-based inference about event frequencies develop? An analysis with a computational process model. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds. ), CogSci 2017: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1053-1058). London: Cognitive Science Society. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2016). Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load. Memory & Cognition, 44(5), 806-818. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0595-x. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2016). More heads choose better than one: Group decision making can eliminate probability matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 907-914. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0949-6. [PubMan] : Navarro, D. J., Newell, B. R., & Schulze, C. (2016). Learning and choosing in an uncertain world: An investigation of the explore-exploit dilemma in static and dynamic environments. Cognitive Psychology, 85, 43-77. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.001. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 78-98. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.002. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Compete, coordinate, and cooperate: How to exploit uncertain environments with social interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 967-981. doi:10.1037/xge0000096. [PubMan]